>
If consciousness is not a fixed identity but an energetic orchestration—then the “self,” as we conventionally experience it, is not a noun but a fluctuating verb. In this part, we will structure this “self” not as a psychological constant, nor a metaphysical essence, but as an emergent, dynamic patterning of energy conditioned by cultural memory, bodily perception, linguistic form, and experiential feedback loops.
To treat this rigorously, we proceed in layers—each representing a threshold of energetic configuration.
I. The Prepersonal Layer: Proto-Energetic Gestures
This is the substrate. The self has not yet taken linguistic shape. No narrative, no memory, only responses—twitches, hungers, aversions. Energetically, it is characterized by raw affective pulses: expansion (interest, pull, pleasure) and contraction (fear, push, tension). These are not “emotions” in the psychological sense, but rather primal directionalities of energy. Here, the body is not a subject but a receiver—a membrane.
This stage corresponds to what early Hindu texts called Tamas—the inertia, the base. In Taoism, it's the undifferentiated Wu Ji before duality emerges. In contemporary terms: it is affective potential—neither conscious nor unconscious, but simply present.
II. The Narrative-Linguistic Layer: Selfhood as Syntax
Language crystallizes energy. It gives contour to the formless field of feeling. The prepersonal becomes the personal as soon as we say I. The moment a child begins to identify by name, energetic flows are no longer free—they’re shaped. Words bind affect into structure. “Fear” becomes my fear. “Desire” becomes I want. This shift produces the ego construct—not a demon to be destroyed, but an engine of energetic filtering.
In this layer, energy becomes vectorized—it flows not randomly but according to the map of one’s beliefs, traumas, cultural conditionings, and inherited linguistic archetypes.
We call this “semantic encoding.” Every memory is not just stored—it’s stored with a weight, a resonance, a charge. That charge determines the activation threshold.
Thus, the self is not memory—but a field of latent energetic responses organized by memory.
This is where psychoanalysis, especially Jung’s work on the complexes, begins to interface. But where Jung leaned toward symbolic interpretation, we treat these formations as energetic attractors. That is, they are not meaningful because of their content—but because of how strongly they pull future energy into their form.
III. The Reactive Layer: Echoes of Energetic Patterning
This layer reveals itself in social settings, in triggers, in habits. It is what happens before thought catches up. A smirk that tightens the jaw. A glance that narrows the eye. A pause that surges with defensiveness. Here, the energetic field becomes rhythmic—it forms predictable oscillations.
Most people live here.
They are not acting; they are reacting. The self becomes a loop of response to stimulus—not because they choose it, but because their energetic field has been shaped into grooves.
This is where the study of Energetic Reflex Arcs becomes crucial—a concept we’ll expand later. In essence, these are self-sustaining circuits of energy activated by environmental or internal cues, running a program without fresh presence.
It explains why people “relapse” into old ways despite insight: energy once given a groove flows downhill. Without a disruption in current, the river carves itself deeper.
IV. The Symbolic Layer: Archetypes as Energetic Forms
Beyond reaction lies interpretation. Humans, being pattern-seeking, attach form to chaos. My suffering must mean something. My anger is not just mine—it is ancestral. I am the warrior, or the orphan, or the trickster.
These are not delusions—they are energetic truths expressed through myth. The psyche stores massive energetic configurations in symbolic code. The myth of Prometheus, of Kali, of the Grail—each encodes a way of holding energy.
This is where we integrate the mythocognitive bridge: the interface between energetic states and archetypal symbols. It forms the connection between Energetics of Selfhood and Mythocognition as twin disciplines.
V. The Witnessing Layer: Selfhood as Event, not Object
Now comes the turn.
In rare moments—often triggered by deep meditation, grief, intimacy, psychedelics, or severe rupture—the energetic structure of the “self” loosens. One no longer refers to self in rigid terms. Instead, one experiences selfhood as an unfolding event, without center.
You do not “have” energy. You are being energy in flux.
Alan Watts, referencing Zen, would say: “You are not a dancer. The dance is.” At this stage, we observe not what the self is, but how it moves.
From this witnessing, many so-called spiritual breakthroughs emerge—not because some higher power descended, but because the rigidity of energetic structuring dissolved.
Here, practices like Zazen, Taoist internal alchemy, or Tantric Shakti sadhana show their usefulness—not as religions, but as energetic disciplines.
VI. The Meta-Field: Selfhood as Relational Energy
Lastly, selfhood is not isolated. The energetic field of a person is always in resonance, dissonance, or entrainment with other fields.
Eye contact alters breath.
A presence enters the room and the heart rate shifts.
A crowd chants and the nervous system synchronizes.
Thus, in Energetics of Selfhood, we reject the notion of “self as unit.” The self is networked flow. It extends, receives, bleeds into and is shaped by the energetic fields of others.
This is not metaphorical. It is observable in the vagus nerve, in oxytocin release, in sympathetic resonance, in mirror neuron studies.
Therefore, selfhood is always contingent—a shifting modulation of forces across bodily, social, cultural, and symbolic terrain.
---
This completes the architectural foundation of the field.
Next, we will proceed towards application: energetic diagnostics, practical interventions, observational frameworks, and its interface with cognition, trauma, politics, aesthetics, and more.